![]() These and more than 30 other missing functions or APIs for WebKit are outlined in the OWA's " Bringing Competition to Walled Gardens" paper.Īpple argues that WebKit limitations are motivated primarily by security and privacy considerations, but Lawson belives Apple's handling of Safari bugs makes a mockery of that claim. ![]() Developers are also frustrated that iOS forces Safari to be used in all instances of in-app browsing. Some Safari features that are not available to other browsers that use WebKit include the ability to display fullscreen video on iPhone, install web apps, use browser extensions, and integrate Apple Pay. "Because at the moment, every browser on iOS, whether it be badged Chrome, Firefox or Edge is actually just a branded skin of Safari, which lags behind because it has no competition on iOS." "The motive of the group is to try to persuade Apple that they need to allow other browser engines on iOS, so the iOS can be a better platform for developing stuff for the modern web," developer Bruce Lawson told The Register. The latest pushback comes in the form of " Open Web Advocacy" or OWA, a project launched by UK-based developers who want third-party access to all the features that Safari enjoys but which are not available in WebKit. Apple requires all third-party browser apps on iOS and iPadOS to use WebKit, but many browser developers are not happy with the limitations this imposes on them. ![]() Apple is being challenged by a group of developers to end WebKit's dominance on its mobile devices and allow other browser engines on iPhone and iPad, following accusations that the current situation amounts to anti-competitive conduct.įor those unfamiliar with WebKit, Apple's browser engine powers Safari and other areas of the operating system where web content is displayed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |